Case precedent showing Statutes are not Laws

 

A "Statute is not a Law" (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1'67, 3 So.2d 244, 248),

A "Code is not a Law" (In Re Self v. Rhay Wn 2d 261), in point of fact in Law, a concurrent or 'joint resolution 'of legislature is not "Law" (Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N.E. 705, 707; Ward vs. State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash 2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 165). 

All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accord with God's Laws. 

"All codes, rules and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process of Law.." (Rodrigues v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)); ...lacking due process [of law], in that they are 'void for ambiguity' in their failure to specify the statutes' aplicability to 'natural persons,' otherwise depriving the same of fair notice, as their  construction by definition of terms aptly identifies the applicability of such statutes to "artificial or fictional corporate entitites or 'persons', creatures of statute, or those by contract employed as agents or representatives, departmental subdivisions, offices, officers, and property of the government, but not the 'Natural Person' or American citizen Immune from such jurisdiction of legalism. 

"The Common Law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land. The codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are "not the law." (Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn 2d 261), They are the law of government for internal regulation, not the law of man, in his separate but equal station and natural state, a sovereign foreign with respect to government generally.)