Example of Conditional Acceptance to "the Census" Offer
The following letter is an example of a response in commerce to the letter that all homes in the UK received regarding what has been denominated the "census." This is really an offer to contract from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) which is a private corporation operating in the public. In the letter they claim that their offer is backed by law (not specified which one), and that not completing their "form", would inccur in penalties of up to £1,000. The idea that a private company can use law to coerce people into giving their own private information, which is their property, is nonsense. Not even the police can demand private information without a crime being committed or suffcient grounds to suspect of a crime (as demonstrated in this recent Supreme Court ruling).
Therefore, it is not lawful it is legal. Meaning that you can accept an offer of giving someone your personal details, only if you choose to. The language is also deceptive as "completion" means that you started it (thus you accepted the offer) and did not complete it. If you accept an offer and you do not want to fullfil the terms of the contract, that is when you can be penalised, but only under Maritime Law. No one can be penalised for choosing not to get into a contract. But if you accept the offer (and thus the terms and conditions of it) without changing the conditions beforehand, then it is legal to enforce such contract.
The letter is directed to the man, Ian Diamond, who is acting as National Statistician. "The National Statistician is the UK Statistics Authority's and the Government's principal adviser on official statistics." The corporation ONS is making a claim about some "law" and some "obligation" that the "householder" has. This conditional acceptance is an honourable response to the offer of contract which puts a new contract on the table with new conditions to be met if both parties want the contract to be implemented. It is not a "no", it is not an offence, it is not a complaint. It is simply a way to say: "you are making a claim, please prove that your claim is valid before I decide to accept it."
Notices of Liability and Conditional Acceptances are the only way to hold people liable for their actions and not accept that they hide behind their job.
The Householder
Sir Ian Diamond,
alleged National Statistician
PO Box 1020
Dagenham
RM9 9QR
NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal
Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent
Dear Prof. Sir Ian Diamond,
There has been delivered to this address a letter
sent to ‘The Householder’. It seems that someone somewhere believes there is
someone of that name residing here, or at least contactable here.
First of all I would like to say that this neither my name nor anyone I am
aware of within this property or my address.
I am keen however to assist you, as you are asking said Householder to assist
you with what you charmingly call “a census”. You also continue your
imprecation with an advisory that all those so named as Householder should
complete said census on Sunday 21 March 2021.
I imagine that such a profoundly important date, the vernal equinox, must presuppose
some sort of magical incantation celebrating the collective harvesting of the
people of Britain’s mass data. I will not further try and guess its purpose, as
I wish to be of immediate assistance to your search and discovery, in the most
expedient way possible.
Yet you follow your very kind ‘ask’ that the Householder’s help is proffered,
with an implicit threat of not only a horrendously large fine of £1,000 but
also stating that the completion of this “census” carries a legal requirement.
Sir Ian, in my book I have always found that a request followed immediately by
a threat, is mostly found to emanate from the criminal fraternity, rather than
from the pen of an alleged statistician, despite him working on behalf of an
arm of an increasingly proven criminal fraudulent regime, calling itself
government.
First of all may I say that in spite of attempts the present overlords coercing
you to be the ‘hitman’ for this incredibly egregious unlawful attempt at forced
entry into the private lives of millions, I would still wish to assist you in
whatever way I can. I will therefore attempt to convey this request to said
‘Householder’ in the swiftest manner I am able, even though I have no idea
where I might uncover said “householder”. I will, for expediency sake, perhaps
call upon my friend M. Hercule Poirot, who in matters of solving unsolvable
mysteries, is as you may be aware, an expert: Before I am able to do so, I will
require the full material, factual and truthful answers to be presented me, in
order to expedite your requests.
It is with that in mind I ask some reasonable, pertinent questions. Once these
have been answered fully and factually, I am happy to further divulge on
questions pointed at, and in my considered opinion, to be the sole territory of
me, myself and I.
The census form in question will be completed and returned subject to receipt
of full clarification of the points and questions contained in this notice.
This is therefore a conditional agreement. This removes controversy and means
that you no longer have any ultimate recourse to a court of law in this matter
because there is no controversy upon which it could adjudicate.
For this reason, it is important that you
consider and respond to this notice and respond in substance, which means actually
addressing the points raised herein. The ‘nearest official form’ will not
suffice, and consequently is likely to be ignored without dishonour.
Notice to one is notice to all should you not be
in a position to respond with clarity to the points stated herein, a suitable
officer or official must be delegated to fulfil these requirements.
On the other hand, there is a time limit on the
agreement being offered. It is reasonable, and if it runs out, then you and all
associated parties are in default, removing any and all lawful excuse on your
part for proceeding in this matter.
You have
apparently made demands upon ‘The
Householder’. Those demands are not understood and cannot therefore be
lawfully fulfilled. Clarification of your document is therefore required so
that I or ‘The Householder’ may act accordingly. Failure to accept this offer
to clarify and to do so completely and in good faith within 7 (seven) days will
be deemed by all parties to mean you and your principle or other parties
abandon all demands upon me and ‘The
Householder’.
Please answer and clarify the following points and questions in full, with
proof of all claims made:
1. What law requires me to complete the
census?
2. From where does the Office for National
Statistics derive the lawful authority to demand private information?
3. Is there a limit to invasion of privacy?
4. Is the Office for National Statistics
lawfully authorised to demand Private property?
5. How can we lawfully be penalised for
failure to provide information?
6. By what authority does the census
collector threaten penalties for failure to provide personal information?
7. Are there any circumstances whereby
security agencies may access census information as suggested by section 39
subsection four of these statistics and registration services Act 2007?
8. Since census data is being requested
under pain of law enforcement and threat of financial hardship, are people able
to decline answering, so as not to risk incriminating themselves, as
authorised, for example, by the Data Protection Act?
9. Because government search and seizure of
private information is prohibited without a court warrant based on probable
cause, current census policies violate that right, do they not?
10. As the public have not been consulted on
the consensus, please explain how this demand for private information is
‘democratic’.
11. Please confirm or deny that any demand
through correspondence such as the census form sent to ‘The Householder’, has
any basis for legal status or legitimacy.
12. The census form states, “the householder
is responsible for ensuring that this questionnaire is completed and returned”
– please provide details of the legal definition upon which the ONS depends in
defining “the householder”.
13. Does the census refer to the “sentient,
physical, living man / woman or the “Legal Fiction/Person”, as identified by
the birth certificates, passports, and other legal documents which have no
legal bearing on this sentient, physical, living man / woman?
14. Does the Office for National Statistics
expect the sentient living man / woman to complete this census on behalf of the
human being themselves or on behalf of the various paper documents, known as
the Legal Fiction/Person, which they represent?
15. Please provide proof of claim that I am a
member of the society whose statutes and subsisting regulations you are
enforcing.
16. Please provide proof and legality whereby the ONS or any of its agents or so-called superior interests are lawfully allowed to encroach upon, demand and make threats to, not only a Private/Family Trust and all that fall under such Trust, but the sacred autonomy and privacy of said Trust.
17. Please provide proof of claim that there
is a nameable SoC that I belong to, and that the laws covered within any
alleged transgressions state that they apply to me within that named Society.
18. Please confirm or deny that the census
data will not be used directly or indirectly for the services of shareholders
in any of the corporations involved in the running of Government Services.
19. Please confirm or deny that the provided
information will be used to form profit making strategies and policies that
will affect well-being.
20. Since every government database has been
hacked, leaked, lost or compromised in some fashion, how exactly can the Office
for National Statistics claim data security and protection of the information
with confidence?
21. Does the Office for National Statistics
take full responsibility for any mishandled or mis-processed data, or loss of
data, or unauthorised accessing of that data by third parties?
22. How would the office for National
Statistics locate, protect and compensate those individuals whose data becomes
compromised?
23. What evidence do you have that I am a
United Kingdom resident?
24. Please confirm or deny that the spiralling
cost estimate of almost £650 million spent at a time of national bankruptcy is
considered by the ONS to be wholly justifiable and appropriate.
25. Please confirm or deny that the
expenditure of tens of millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money in order to advertise
the census is wholly appropriate and necessary at a time of national
bankruptcy.
26. Please confirm or deny that the census
data will be handled by an offshoot of an American arms manufacturer Lockheed
Martin, Lockheed Martin UK and SERCO, a widely known partner of Lockheed
Martin.
27. Please confirm or deny that Lockheed
Martin have in the past been charged with illegally spying on UK citizens.
28. Please confirm or deny that Lockheed
Martin works with the CIA and FBI and that they have a lengthy record of crimes
against humanity.
29. Please confirm or deny that while it may
be illegal for UK intelligence agencies to spy on the population without a
warrant, that it is not illegal for US intelligence services to spy on the UK
population with such a warrant.
30. Given their track record for such actions
please confirm or deny that Lockheed Martin have not in the case of the census
consultancy paid bribes to individuals in order to secure the contract
estimated at hundred of millions of pounds.
31. It is suggested that Lockheed Martin have
no moral fibre social conscience or scruples and it is further suggested that
they are one of the most disreputable companies in the world – please confirm
or deny this.
32. It is suggested that thousands of
lawsuits have been filed against Lockheed Martin for everything from racial
discrimination to fraud. If this were the case, it would prevent them or any
partners from fulfilling their contract with the ONS – please confirm or deny
this.
33. It is reported that Lockheed Martin have
lobbied for the illegal war in Iraq and that they have been the main arms
suppliers to the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine, thus making them
responsible for the death of millions of human beings – please confirm or deny
this.
34. Please confirm or deny that personal details
collected in your census will be processed in a plant run by an American firm,
staff of which were prosecuted for stealing the student loans records of US
President Obama, among other incriminations.
35. Please confirm or deny that the personal
data collected by your census will not be sold, given, loaned or in any other
way disseminated to companies offering online “directory” services such as
192.com or hard copy-based or online directory services such as Yellow Pages or
Thomson local, or any similar or associated organisations.
36. Please confirm or deny that all US
companies are subject to the Patriot Act which allows the US government full
access to any data in that company’s possession.
37. It is claimed that only staff who work
for the ONS will have access to the “full census data set”; please confirm or
deny that it would not be possible for several members of ONS staff (each
having access to separate data sets) to collude in order to collect together a
full data set of information in contravention to the security measures
supposedly put in place.
38. Please confirm or deny that the
statistics and registration services Act 2007 section 39 subsection four would
allow disclosure of personal information to any and or all of the following:
a) The 56 geographical and eight non-geographical UK police forces and in
particular the Devon and Cornwall Police who are currently owned by the
Corporation known as International Business Machines (IBM).
b) The three UK intelligence agencies (MI5, MI6
and GC HQ).
c) The Department for Works and Pensions.
d) Private investigators working for the
Department for Work and Pensions to hunt down alleged benefit cheats?
e) Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs tax
investigators.
f) “Approved” insurance industry and “anti-fraud”
investigators/private investigators.
g) The Home Office Border and Immigration Agency.
h) The Serious Organised Crime Agency (either for
domestic investigations into serious crimes, or for these and also for minor
investigations if requested by a foreign law enforcement agency under the
mutual legal assistance treaties).
i) Lawyers in civil court cases e.g. for divorce,
libel or copyright infringement etc.
j) Local authority trading standards departments.
k) Local authority environmental health
departments.In relation to the notice on the front of the household
questionnaire which reads “Your response is required by law”. Please provide
details of which laws apply to the protection of personal information and your
assurances that ‘your answers will be kept confidential’.
39. In relation to the notice on the front of the
household questionnaire which reads “Your response is required by law”. Please
provide details of which laws apply to the protection of personal information
and your assurances that ‘your answers will be kept confidential’.
40. Can you confirm that “census information is
kept confidential for 100 years. This would mean that when we send you
information with all inputted information electronically to the address, they
are securely stored and will remain unexamined by anyone for 100 years. Is this
offer to contract not fraudulent and therefore null and void?
41. Please confirm the method by which the paper
and electronic capture will be handled following the said capture of the
information into electronic form.
a) If the paper and electronic information is to be stored please confirm under
what circumstances storage will be carried out;
b) if the paper and electronic information is to be recycled, please confirm
under which circumstances recycling will be carried out;
c) confirm or deny whether the physical form will be kept as security, as you
say the ONS intends to keep the electronic data.
42. Please confirm or deny that the census form
constitutes a contract.
43. Given that individuals have been
criminalised under UK terrorism legislation for causing information to be
brought together, by being accused that by compiling such information (even if
it be in the public domain), they are assisting potential terrorists – please
confirm or deny that by providing information via the census form or
electronically online, I will not be providing information to a foreign power
who might have access to that data and so gain an advantage over this sovereign
nation.
44. Given the ONS has confirmed that the census
will go ahead despite the COVID-19 pandemic, in part because the
information obtained will assist government and public understanding of the
pandemic’s impact, please supply all material proof of such a pandemic to exist
and all evidence and proof of existence of not only a virus existing but
Covid-19’s existence, thus supporting claims for the necessity for questions
asked in the 2021 census.
45. In order to maintain equality under law,
please provide to me the exact same information required from me pertaining to
each and every individual who has, is or ever will handle the census information
in whatever possible form.
46. Given the premise that “time is money”,
please provide documented proof under what authority the census must be
completed in my own private time and at my own expense.
47. Please provide documented proof that I cannot
charge a fee in advance for the provision of my time and personal information
for the purposes of the census. Failure to do so will result in an invoice
being issued which must be settled in advance prior to the completion of the
census.
Please provide your response in the form of a
“statement of truth”, sworn under penalty of perjury and upon your full
commercial liability within (7) seven consecutive days of receipt of this
notice. If your “full” response conforming to the above criteria is not
received, within this appointed time it will be deemed a tacit agreement by
virtue of your acquiescence that this census is unlawful and that there is no
obligation to participate either as a Common Law sentient being or as the
representative for the legal fiction identity and any further correspondence or
communication on this matter must cease immediately.
With reference to
section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 and the Protection from
Harassment Act 1997, any attempt to contact me or “THE HOUSEHOLDER” regarding this matter after the appointed time
will be in breach of these acts and will render you guilty of harassment and
blackmail which may result in you being reported to the relevant bodies.
Please also note that by attempting to contact me
or “the Householder” by telephone regarding this matter after the appointed
time, you will also be in breach of the Wireless Telegraph Act 1949, which may
result in you being reported to both Trading Standards and the Office of Fair
Trading and may also constitute a criminal offence under section 127 of the
Communications Act 2003.
Finally, you do
not, nor have you ever had, my permission to use or process my personal data in
anyway, and so pursuant to the Data Protection Act in 1998, I hereby demand
that you cease use of any and all data with regard to me or ‘THE HOUSEHOLDER’, and that you
immediately destroy all of my data held on your records. Failure to do so will
result in a report being submitted to the Information Commissioner for data
protection breaches.
This census form has been respectfully returned
or refused to be filled in. Please reissue if or when all of the above points
and questions have been addressed in full and all the required conditions have
been met.
Sincerely without malice, ill will, vexation or
frivolity.
THE HOUSEHOLDER
Without any admission of any liability
whatsoever, and with all natural inalienable, rights reserved.
Errors and omissions accepted.
Copies of this notice of conditional acceptance
have also been sent to: (by Royal Mail)
Census Customer Services,
ONS,
Segensworth Rd,
Titchfield,
Fareham ,
Hampshire
PO15 5RR
and:
FREEPOST 2021 Census,
Processing Centre,
UK
Comments
Post a Comment